Allegedly, Google is paying some AI employees to do nothing, supposedly to keep them away from competitors. I believe it’s the other way around: Google is making it look like paying people to do nothing is about competition, rather than admitting management incompetence.
Allegedly, Google is paying some AI employees to do nothing, supposedly to keep them away from competitors. I believe it’s the other way around: Google is making it look like paying people to do nothing is about competition, rather than admitting management incompetence.
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.